Skip to content

Alternative & Emerging

Peer-to-Peer Lending

Lend directly to borrowers and collect the interest banks usually keep

Updated 2026-08-04

At a glance

Capital needed
Medium capital$500 – $10k
Time to first income
MonthsPart-time friendly
Income ceiling
Salary replacement~$30k – $80k/yr
Risk
High4 out of 5
Effort model
Passive
Route to wealth
Compounding
Scalability
4 out of 5
Competition
1 out of 5
Typical earnings
4–9% net of defaults in normal conditions, materially lower in downturns
Startup cost
Often $500–$5,000 minimum, depending on the platform

How it works

Platforms match people who want to borrow with people who want to lend, taking a fee and handling collection. You receive interest and principal monthly. The headline rate is always higher than a savings account, and the difference is credit risk you are taking on directly rather than a bank taking it for you.

How to start

  1. 01

    Evaluate the platform before the loans

    Track record through a full credit cycle, what happens if the platform fails, and whether client money is segregated. Several platforms have collapsed and taken lender funds with them.

  2. 02

    Spread across many small loans

    A single default should be trivial. That means hundreds of small positions, not a few large ones, which is the most important discipline in this asset.

  3. 03

    Judge returns after defaults, not before

    An advertised 11% with 5% defaults is 6% before tax. The advertised figure is rarely the relevant one.

  4. 04

    Understand the liquidity terms

    Secondary markets exist on some platforms and dry up exactly when everyone wants to exit. Assume capital is committed for the loan term.

  5. 05

    Keep it to a small share of your portfolio

    The risk-adjusted return rarely justifies a large allocation, and correlations rise when the economy weakens.

Honest trade-offs

What works

  • Higher headline yields than savings accounts or government bonds
  • Monthly income including both interest and principal repayment
  • Largely passive once auto-invest rules are configured
  • Genuinely uncorrelated with equity markets in normal conditions

What does not

  • Real risk of losing capital; these are unsecured loans to individuals or small firms
  • Defaults rise sharply in recessions, exactly when other assets are also falling
  • Illiquid, with secondary markets that fail under stress
  • Interest is usually taxed as income at full rates

Risks and failure modes

  • Platform failure, which is not a theoretical risk and has happened repeatedly
  • Default rates exceeding modelled expectations in a downturn
  • Limited or no deposit protection compared with a bank account

Common questions

Typically 4–9% net of defaults in benign conditions. Platforms advertise gross rates, and the gap between gross and net is the whole question. In recessions, net returns have fallen to zero or below on some platforms.

No. These are unsecured loans without the deposit protection a bank account has, and the platform itself is a point of failure. Diversification across hundreds of loans reduces individual default impact but does nothing about a systemic downturn.

Higher yield, materially higher risk and much worse liquidity. Government bonds protect capital; P2P lending pays you to accept the possibility of losing some. They serve different purposes and should not be substituted for one another.